تَأثير المواَطنة الرَقمية للأبنَاء ووالديهِم على الاِتصال الأُسري المُباشر لَديهِم: تحليل ثُنائي باستخدام نَموذج الترابُط بَين المُمثل والشريک

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلف

المعهد التکنولوجي العالي للإعلام بالمنيا

المستخلص

استَهدفَت الدراسة الکَشف عن تَأثير المواَطنة الرَقمية للأبنَاء ووالديهِم على الاِتصال الأُسري المُباشر لَديهِم، مِن خِلال تَحليل ثُنائي في إطار نَموذج الترابُط بَين المُمثل والشريک، وتَنتمي هذه الدراسة إلى الدراسات الوَصفية التي وَظَّفَت مَنهج المَسح بالاعتماد على الاستبانة کَأداة لِجمع البيانات مِن عَينة مُتعددة المراحل وفقًا لمُحاکاة “MONTE CARLO”، وقَد شارک في التَطبيقعَينة قَوامها (265) زوجًا مِن الأبنَاء ووالديهِم. وقد خَلصت الدراسة لِعدة نَتائج، أَهمها: الاستَخدام المُفرط للوسائط الرَقمية المُتعددَّة مِن الأبنَاء ووالديهِم، کما امتَلک الأبنَاء خبرة "مُرتفعة" في استخدام الوسائط الرَقمية مُقابل خبرة "مُتوسطة" للوالدَينِ، أيضًا لدى الأبنَاء ووالديهِممُستوى مواَطنة رَقمية "مُرتفع" لِکلَيهما؛ أيضًا کان للأبنَاء ووالديهِم مُستوى اتصالٍ أُسريٍ مُباشر "مُرتفع" لکِلَيهما، وفي إطار مُتصل أَفادت نَتائج التَحليِلات الثُنائية المُعتَمدة عَلى نَموذج الترابُط بَين المُمثل والشريک (APIM)أن الاتصال الأُسري المُباشر للأبنَاء مُرتبط بِشَکلٍ إيجابيٍ بمُستوى المواَطنة الرَقمية لَديهِم ولَدى والديهِم، کماأن الاتصال الأُسري المُباشر للوالدَينِ مُرتبط بِشَکلٍ إيجابيٍ بمُستوى المواَطنة الرَقمية لَديهِم ولَدى أبنَائهِم، إضافةً إلىوجود عَلاَقة دالة إحصائيًا بَين کل مِن: مُستوى المواَطنة الرَقمية للأبنَاء ووالديهِم، ومُستوى الاتصال الأُسري المُباشر للأبنَاء ووالديهِم.

الكلمات الرئيسية

الموضوعات الرئيسية


-Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. (2020). MCIT YEARBOOK. Available on: https://mcit.gov.eg/Ar/ publication/publication-Summary/9260
-KEMP, S. (15 FEBRUARY 2022). DIGITAL 2021: EGYPT. we are social & Hootsuite, Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-egypt
-        Nagy, M. (2019). almuatanat alraqamiat wamadaa alwaey biha ladaa talabat qism almaktabat walwathayiq walmaelumat bijamieat 'asyuta" dirasat aistikshafiati. almajalat aleilmiat lilmaktabat walwathayiq walmaelumati, 2(1).
-        ISTE Digital citizenship (2016). ISTE Standard. Retrieved 7/4/2022 from: https://www.iste.org/explore/cateegorylist?cood= Digital+citizenship
-        Ribble, Mike. (2015). Digital Citizenship in Schools. Washington, USA: ISTE. 212p.
- Khalil, J., Abdul Karim, H. (2015). almwaatnt alraqmyt mdkhlaan lmusaedt 'abnayina ealaa alhayat fi aleasr alraqmy. majalat albuhuth alnafsiat waltarbawiati. 30(4), 1-42.
- Alqahtani, A. (2018). madaa tadmyn qiam almwaatnt alraqmyt fi muqrr tiqnyat altaelim min wijhat nazr 'aeda' hayyat alttdrys. majalat aljamieat al'iislamiat lildirasat altarbawiat walnafsiati. 26(1), 57-97.
- Bouchlak, N. (2013). alaitisal al'usariu wadawruh fi tafeil alealaqat dakhil al'usr. almultqa alwatanii althaani bieunwani: alaitisal wajudat alhayaat fi al'usr. kuliyat aleulum alaijtimaeiati, jamieat Kasdi Merbah.
-  Alhasan, E. (2015). alnazariaat aliajtimaeiat almutaqadimatu. dar Wayil lilnashr waltawziei.
-  Mikawi, H., Alsayid, L. (2006). alaitisal wanazariaatuh almueasr. aldaar Almisriat Allubnaniat.
- Abd alhamid, M. (2004). nazariaat al'iielam watijahat altaathira. Alam Alkutub.
-Solomon, C. (2003). Transactional analysis theory: The basics. Transactional analysis journal33(1), 15-22.‏
-Kashy, D. A., Kenny, D. A., Reis, H. T., & Judd, C. M. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology38, 451-477.‏
-Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor–partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development29(2), 101-109.‏
-Telzer, E. H. (2010). Expanding the acculturation gap-distress model: An integrative review of research. Human Development53(6), 313-340.‏
-Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.‏
-Sancho Gil, J. M., Hernández Hernández, F., & Rivera Vargas, P. J. (2016). Visualidades contemporáneas, ciudadanía y sabiduría digital: Afrontar las posibilidades sin eludir las tensiones RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 15(2), 25-37.
-Searson, M., Hancock, M., Soheil, N., & Shepherd, G. (2015). Digital citizenship within global contexts. Education and Information Technologies20(4), 729-741.‏
- Awfi, M., Batoush, A. (2016). tiknulujia aliatisal alhadithat wanamat alhayat aliajtimaeiat lil'usrat alhadariat Aljazayiria: 'ayat ealaqati. majalat aleulum al'iinsaniat waliaijtimaeiati. 2(26), 457-467.
- Abd Allah, H. (2021). tathir mawaqie altawasul alajtimaeii al'usarii min wijhat nazar alwalidiyni: dirasatan maydaniatan fi madinat almusl. majalat jamieat Al'anbar lileulum Al'iinsania. 2(3), 229-257.
-Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. The Journal of Family Communication6(2), 119-138.‏
-Chi, X., Hong, X., & Chen, X. (2020). Profiles and sociodemographic correlates of Internet addiction in early adolescents in southern China. Addictive behaviors106, 106385.‏
-Liu, Q., Lin, Y., Zhou, Z., & Zhang, W. (2019). Perceived parent–adolescent communication and pathological Internet use among Chinese adolescents: a moderated mediation model. Journal of Child and Family Studies28(6), 1571-1580.‏
-Sela, Y., Zach, M., Amichay-Hamburger, Y., Mishali, M., & Omer, H. (2020). Family environment and problematic internet use among adolescents: the mediating roles of depression and fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior106, 106226.‏
-Taipale, S., & Farinosi, M. (2018, July). The big meaning of small messages: the use of WhatsApp in intergenerational family communication. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population (pp. 532-546). Springer, Cham.‏
- Albayda, M. (2016). aistikhdamat alshabab almisrii litatbiqat altafaeul biwasayil altiknulujya alhadithat watathiratiha ealaa alealaqat al'usariati: dirasat maydaniati. almajalat Almisria libuhuth al'iielami. kuliyat al'iielami, jamieat Alqahira,. 57(5), 239-298.
- Zuqagh, R. (2018). 'athar alfisbuk ealaa altawasul al'usarii liltilmidh aljazayirii: dirasat maydaniat ealaa eayinat min talamidh thanawiat 'ahmad likhadar bukharubat 'ami albawaqi. risalat majistir ghayr manshwr. qism aleulum al'iinsaniati, kuliyat aleulum al'iinsaniat walaijtimaeiati, jamieat Alearabii bin Mahidi (Umm El Bouaghi).
- Mustafaa, R. (2020). aistikhdam shabakat alfis buk wa'atharuh ealaa alealaqati: almujtamae alkurdiu nmwdhjan. majalat alfunun wal'adab waeulum al'iinsaniaat walajtimaei. kuliyat Al'iimarat lileulum altarbawiati, 84(4), 125-142.
- Nueman, F. (2019). astikhdam almurahiqin lilhawatif aldhakiat waealaqatiha bialeuzlat aliajtimaeiat ladayhim. majalat dirasat altufulati. kuliyat aldirasat aleulya liltufulati, jamieat Ain Shams, 84.( 2), 131-136.
- Abu Rumi, R. (2017). 'adawat altawasul al'iiliktrunii waldabt al'usri: dirasat maydaniata. dirasat aleulum al'iinsaniat waliajtimaeiati. 2.(1), 1-12.
- Al-Ahmari, F. (2014). 'athar aistikhdam wasayil altawasul alaitisal alhadithat ealaa alhiwar al'usari: dirasatan mutbqt ealaa eaynt min al'usr alsaeudiat bimadinat alriyad. risalat majistir ghayr manshwr. qism aldirasat alaijtimaeiati, eimadat aldirasat aleulya, jamieat Almalik Saeud.
- Abd Allah, M. (2018). 'athar mawaqie altawasul aliajtimaeii ealaa alkhuras al'usri-dirasat fi nazariat aliastikhdamat wal'iishbaeat mawqie fayisbuk Facebook- nmwdhjan-. hawliaat jamieat Aljazayir. 32(2), 509- 539.
- Ismaeil, A. (2019). astikhdam al'abna' shabakat altawasul alajtimaeii waneikasuha ealaa 'anmat alhiwar al'usari. majalat alfunun wal'adab waeulum al'iinsaniaat waliajtimaei. kuliyat Al'iimarat lileulum altarbawiati, 42(4), 270-299.
-Manzuoli, C. H., Sánchez, A. V., & Bedoya, E. D. (2019). Digital Citizenship: A Theoretical Review of the Concept and Trends. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET18(2), 10-18.‏
-        Arif, R. (2016). Internet as a hope or a hoax for emerging democracies: Revisiting the concept of citizenship in the digital age. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences236, 4-8.‏
-        Ortega-Gabriel, W. (2015). Ciudadanía digital: Entre la novedad del fenómeno y las limitaciones del concepto. Economía, sociedad y territorio15(49), 835-844.‏
-        Gorman, G. E. (2015). What’s missing in the digital world? Access, digital literacy and digital citizenship. Online Information Review, 39(2).
-        Mesa, A. L. S., & Romero, O. C. (2016). La educación para la competencia digital en los centros escolares: la ciudadanía digital/Education for digital competence in schools: digital citizenship. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa-RELATEC15(2), 95-112.‏
-Couldry, N., Stephansen, H., Fotopoulou, A., MacDonald, R., Clark, W., & Dickens, L. (2014). Digital citizenship? Narrative exchange and the changing terms of civic culture. Citizenship Studies18(6-7), 615-629.‏
-Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2017). Digital citizenship and surveillance| digital citizenship and surveillance society—introduction. International Journal of Communication11, 9.‏
-        Simsek, E., & Simsek, A. (2013). New literacies for digital citizenship. Contemporary educational technology4(2), 126-137.‏
-        Area-Moreira, M., & Pessoa, T. (2012). From solid to liquid: New literacies to the cultural changes of web 2.0. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación19(38), 13-20.‏
-Vilchez, M. D. C. R. (2011). Investigaciones internacionales sobre la implicación cívica de adolescentes y jóvenes. Ciudadanos adolescentes en la era digital. Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado14(2), 71-79.‏
-Karaduman, H. (2017). Social Studies Teacher Candidates' Opinions about Digital Citizenship and Its Place in Social Studies Teacher Training Program: A Comparison between the USA and Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET16(2), 93-106.‏
-        Sullivan, C. (2016). Digital citizenship and the right to digital identity under international law. Computer Law & Security Review32(3), 474-481.‏
-        Fejes, A., & Rahm, L. (2017). Popular education and the digital citizen: a genealogical analysis. European journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults8(1), 21-36.‏
-        Hivon, J., & Titah, R. (2017). Conceptualizing citizen participation in open data use at the city level. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy.‏ 11(1), 99-118.
-        Zapatero, M. D. C., Brändle, G., & San-Román, J. A. R. (2015). Hacia la construcción de una ciudadanía digital. Nuevos modelos de participación y empoderamiento a través de Internet. Prisma social, (15), 643-684.‏
-Gazi, Z. A. (2016). Internalization of Digital Citizenship for the Future of All Levels of Education. Education & Science/Egitim Ve Bilim41(186).‏
-Alcaide–Muñoz, L., Rodríguez–Bolívar, M. P., Cobo, M. J., & Herrera–Viedma, E. (2017). Analysing the scientific evolution of e-Government using a science mapping approach. Government information quarterly34(3), 545-555.‏
-Choi, M., Glassman, M., & Cristol, D. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Computers & education107, 100-112.‏
-Cabrera, F., Marín, M. A., Rodríguez, M., & Espín, J. V. (2005). La juventud ante la ciudadanía. Revista de investigación educativa23(1), 133-172.‏
-Isman, A., & Gungoren, O. C. (2013). Being digital citizen. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences106, 551-556.‏
-Techataweewan, W., & Prasertsin, U. (2018). Development of digital literacy indicators for Thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences39(2), 215-221.‏
-Jiménez Cortés, R. (2016). Ciudadanía digital y bienestar de las mujeres rurales en las redes sociales. RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnologia Educativa, 15 (2), 81-94.
-Gao, X., & Lee, J. (2017). E-government services and social media adoption: Experience of small local governments in Nebraska state. Government Information Quarterly34(4), 627-634.‏
-Blevins, B., LeCompte, K., & Wells, S. (2014). Citizenship education goes digital. The Journal of Social Studies Research38(1), 33-44.
-Pellegrino, A. M., Zenkov, K., & Calamito, N. (2013). “Pay attention and take some notes”: Middle school youth, multimodal instruction, and notions of citizenship. The Journal of Social Studies Research37(4), 221-238.‏
-Oyedemi, T. (2015). Participation, citizenship and internet use among South African youth. Telematics and Informatics32(1), 11-22.‏
-Gozálvez, V. (2011). Educación para la ciudadanía democrática en la cultura digital= Education for Democratic Citizenship in a Digital Culture. Educación para la ciudadanía democrática en la cultura digital= Education for Democratic Citizenship in a Digital Culture, 1-15.‏
-Espaliú Berdud, C. (2015). La relevancia de los medios digitales en la Iniciativa Ciudadana Europea. IDP: Revista de Internet, Derecho y Politica, (21).‏
-Hernández, M. E., Vilchez, M. D. C. R., & Rodríguez, J. B. M. (2013). Jóvenes interactivos y culturas cívicas: sentido educativo, mediático y político del 15M. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, (40), 57-67.‏
-  Sulayman, H. (2020). altarbiat ealaa almuatanat alraqamiati: darurat mulihatan limuajahat altataruf alfikrii: dirasatan maydaniatan ealaa tulaab kuliyat altarbiat - jamieat Damyati. majalat kuliyat altarbiati. kuliyat altarbiati, jamieat Port Said, 32.(3), s 266- 344.
- Zayid, A. (2021). alealaqat bayn mustawaa almuatanat alraqamiat ladaa alshabab aljamieii wa'iidrakihim lil'akhbar alzaayifat eabr mawaqie altawasul alaijtimaeii. majalat albuhuth al'iielamiati. kuliyat al'iielami, jamieat Al'azhar,.57(2), 719-766.
-  Nada, S. (2021). almuatanat alraqamiat wataghayur alqiam fi almujtamae almisrii: dirasat wasfiat mutbaqat ealaa kuliyat altarbiat - jamieat al'iiskandariati. majalat kuliyat aladab. kuliyat aladab, jamieat alfuyum, 13 (2), 2073-2130.
- Omran, M., Odeh, M. (2020). almuatanat alraqamiat waealaqatuha bialsuwk alsawii liltifl wal'usr. majalat eulum altarbiati. kuliyat altarbiat alriyadiati, jamieat Babla, 6(4), 274-294.
-Bonito, J. A. (2002). The analysis of participation in small groups: Methodological and conceptual issues related to interdependence. Small Group Research33(4), 412-438.‏
-Cook, W. L., & Snyder, D. K. (2005). Analyzing nonindependent outcomes in couple therapy using the actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology19(1), 133.‏
-Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user–friendly guide. Personal Relationships9(3), 327-342.‏
-Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wlhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion3(1), 48.‏
-Berg, E. C., Trost, M., Schneider, I. E., & Allison, M. T. (2001). Dyadic exploration of the relationship of leisure satisfaction, leisure time, and gender to relationship satisfaction. Leisure sciences23(1), 35-46.‏
-Lakey, S., & Canary, D. (2002). Actor goal achievement and sensitivity to partner as critical factors in understanding interpersonal communication competence and conflict strategies. Communication Monographs69(3), 217-235.‏
-Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: both partners' personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of personality and social psychology79(2), 251.‏
-Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Kashy, D. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2001). Attachment orientations, dependence, and behavior in a stressful situation: An application of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships18(6), 821-843.‏
-Rayens, M. K., & Svavarsdottir, E. K. (2003). A new methodological approach in nursing research: An actor, partner, and interaction effect model for family outcomes. Research in nursing & health26(5), 409-419.‏
-Ledermann, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). A toolbox with programs to restructure and describe dyadic data. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships32(8), 997-1011.‏
-        Garcia, R. L., Kenny, D. A., & Ledermann, T. (2015). Moderation in the actor–partner interdependence model. Personal Relationships22(1), 8-29.‏
-        Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal18(4), 595-612.‏
-        Kenny, D. A., & Ledermann, T. (2010). Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of family psychology24(3), 359.‏
-Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong,Y. F.,&Congdon, R. (2001). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling (2nd ed.). Stokie, IL: Scientific Software International.
-Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user–friendly guide. Personal Relationships9(3), 327-342.‏
-Ledermann, T., Rudaz, M., Wu, Q., & Cui, M. (2022). Determine power and sample size for the simple and mediation Actor–Partner Interdependence Model. Family Relations.‏
-Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of statistical software48(2), 1-36.
-Stas, L., Kenny, D. A., Mayer, A., & Loeys, T. (2018). Giving dyadic data analysis away: A user‐friendly app for actor–partner interdependence models. Personal relationships25(1), 103-119.‏
-Duck, S. (1994). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Sage Publications, Inc.‏
-Koerner, A. F., & Schrodt, P. (2014). An introduction to the special issue on family communication patterns theory. Journal of Family Communication14(1), 1-15.‏
-        Muhamad, A. (2021). alyat aljumhur almisrii fi althaquq min al'akhbar alzaayifat waealaqatih banmathum altafaeuliat bimawaqie altawasul alaijtimaeii. majalat albuhuth Al'iielamiati. 2(3), 1003-1066.
- Abd Alhakim, I. (2021). almakhatir alaijtimaeiat wal'amniat limawaqie altawasul alaijtimaeii ealaa eayinat min altulaab bijamieat Janub Alwadi Qena. majalat buhuth fi eilm almaktabat walmaelumati. (26), 250-286.
- Ali, F. (2020). aietimad alshabab alsaeudii ealaa mawaqie altawasul alaijtimaeii fi alhusul ealaa almaelumat hawl 'azmat kuruna. majalat albuhuth al'iielamiati. 6(25), 3253-3314.
- Muhamad, J. (2020). taearad tulaab aljamieat almisriat lilshaayieat wal'akhbar alzaayifat eabr mawaqie altawasul alaijtimaeii watathiriha ealayhim: dirasatan maydaniati. risalat majistir ghayr manshuratin. qism al'iielami, kuliyat aladab, jamieat Almanufia.
- Salama, H. (2020). al'akhbar almuzayafat ealaa wasayil altawasul alaijtimaeii wakafa'atiha kamasadir lilmaelumat ean jayihat kwruna. almajalat almisriat libuhuth alraay aleami. kuliyat al'iielami, jamieat Alqahira,) 2.(5), 161-235.
- Alshirbini, M. (2021). aistikhdam alshabab aljamieii limawaqie altawasul alaijtimaeii fi altazawud bialmaelumat waqt al'azmati: dirasat maydaniat ealaa eaynt min tulaab qism al'iielami. almajalat aleilmiat libuhuth al'iielami. qism alsahafati, kuliyat al'iielami, jamieat Alqahira, 1-48.
- Hamdi, M. (2018). aietimad alshabab aljamieii ealaa mawaqie altawasul alaijtimaeii fi altazawud bialmaelumati: dirasatan mushiatan fi jamieat Tabuk Alsaeudiati. risalat majistir ghayr manshura. qism alsahafat wal'iielami, kuliyat Al'iielam, jamieat Alsharq Al'awsat.
- Qasim, M. (2018). alaistikhdamat altaelimiat lil'iielam alaijtimaeii ladaa tulaab altaelim aljamieii: dirasatan maydaniatan ealaa tulaab kuliyat altarbiat bijamieat almalik saeud. majalat albahth altarbawi. almarkaz alqawmia lilbuhuth altarbawiat waltanmiat bi Alqahira, 204-273.
- 'Ibrahim, E. (2018). 'athar aistikhdam shabakat altawasul alaijtimaeii ealaa alqiam ladaa alshababi: dirasat maydaniat ealaa talibat jamieat alqasima. majalat albuhuth altijariati. kuliyat altijarati, jamieat Alzaqaziq, 103-150.
-        Shearer, E. G. (2017). News use across social media platforms . Retrieved from www.journalism.org: http://www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2017/
- Ahmed, A. (2018). alqudrat altanabuwiyat li'anmat altawasul al'usri, walkafa'at aldhaatiat alaijtimaeiat walainfiealiat wal'akadimiat bialmurunat almaerifiat ladaa tulaab alsafi aleashir. risalat dukturat ghayr manshur. kuliyat Altarbiati, jamieat Alyrmuk.
-Lye, D. (1996). Adult child-parents relationships. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 79-102.
-Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families. American journal of Sociology103(2), 429-60.‏
-Dykstra, P. A., & Komter, A. E. (2006). The Netherlands Kinship Panel Study: An introduction. Family solidarity in the Netherlands, 11-20.‏
-        Young, M., & Willmott, P. (1957). Family and kinship in East London. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
-        Litwak, E. (1960). Geographic mobility and extended family cohesion. American Sociological Review, 25, 385-394.
-        Adams, B. N. (1968). Kinship in an urban setting. Chicago: Markham.
-        Goldthorpe, J. H., Llewellyn, C., & Payne, C. (1980). Social mobility and class structure in modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-Lawton, L., Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V. (1994). Affection, social contact, and geographic distance between adult children and their parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 57-68.
-        Butterfield, R. M. (2001). Health related social control and marital power: A test of two models. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61(12-B), 6757. On Butterfield, R. M. (2000). Health-related social control and marital power: A test of two models. University of Colorado at Boulder.‏