- Martínez-Córcoles, M., Teichmann, M., & Murdvee, M. (2017). Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire. Technology in Society, 51, 183-188
- Wang, K., Shu, Q., & Tu, Q. (2008). Technostress under different organizational environments: An empirical investigation. Computers in human behavior, 24(6), 3002-3013.
- Rosen, L. D., Sears, D. C., & Weil, M. M. (1993). Treating technophobia: A longitudinal evaluation of the computerphobia reduction program. Computers in human behavior, 9(1), 27-50.
- Rosen, L. D., & Weil, M. M. (1995). Computer availability, computer experience and technophobia among public school teachers. Computers in human behavior, 11(1), 9-31.
- Brosnan, M. J. (1999). Modeling technophobia: A case for word processing. Computers in human behavior, 15(2), 105-121
- Anthony, L. M., Clarke, M. C., & Anderson, S. J. (2000). Technophobia and personality subtypes in a sample of South African university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(1), 31-44
- Hogan, M. (2009). Age differences in technophobia: an Irish study. In Information Systems Development (pp. 117-130). Springer, Boston, MA.
- Bardakci, S., Alakurt, T., Akyüz, H., & Samsa, S. (2010). Pre-service teachers and technology: gender, technology experience, beliefs and predisposition to technophobia. In 9Th international internet education conference & exhibition (pp. 1-10
- Zarina, I., Circenis, K., & Erts, R. (2018). Measuring the technophobia among middle-aged and older adults in Latvia: A pilot study. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 51, p. 02003). EDP Sciences.
- Agha, S., & Saeed, M. (2015). Factors influencing customer acceptance of online banking in Pakistan and the moderating effect of technophobia. technology, 12(1).
- Korukonda, A. R., & Finn, S. (2003). An investigation of framing and scaling as confounding variables in information outcomes: The case of technophobia. Information Sciences, 155(1-2), 79-88.
- Khasawneh, O. Y. (2018). Technophobia: Examining its hidden factors and defining it. Technology in Society, 54(1), 93-100.
- Clarke, M. C. (2000). Technological experience and technophobia in South African university students.
- Thatcher, J. B., Loughry, M. L., Lim, J., & McKnight, D. H. (2007). Internet anxiety: An empirical study of the effects of personality, beliefs, and social support. Information & management, 44(4), 353-363.
- Achuonye, K. A., & Ezekoka, G. K. (2011). Technophobia among female undergraduate students: A challenge to attainment of the MDGs in Nigeria. British Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 49-57.
-Khasawneh, O. Y. (2018). Technophobia without boarders: The influence of technophobia and emotional intelligence on technology acceptance and the moderating influence of organizational climate. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 210-218.
- Oh, C., Lee, T., Kim, Y., Park, S., Kwon, S., & Suh, B. (2017, May). Us vs. them: Understanding artificial intelligence technophobia over the google deepmind challenge match. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2523-2534).
- Subero-Navarro, Á., Pelegrín-Borondo, J., Reinares-Lara, E., & Olarte-Pascual, C. (2022). Proposal for modeling social robot acceptance by retail customers: CAN model+ technophobia. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102813.
- Koul, S., & Eydgahi, A. (2020). The impact of social influence, technophobia, and perceived safety on autonomous vehicle technology adoption. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 48(2), 133-142.
- Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (1995). The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: A study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty-three countries. Computers in human behavior, 11(1), 95-133.
- Clarke, M. C. (2000). Op.Cit..
- Di Giacomo, D., Ranieri, J., D’Amico, M., Guerra, F., & Passafiume, D. (2019). Psychological barriers to digital living in older adults: computer anxiety as predictive mechanism for technophobia. Behavioral Sciences, 9(9), 96
- Nimrod, G. (2021). Not good days for technophobes: older internet users during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Gerontology, 47(4), 160-171.
- Xi, W., Zhang, X., & Ayalon, L. (2022). When less intergenerational closeness helps: The influence of intergenerational physical proximity and technology attributes on technophobia among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 131, 107234.
- Longe, O. B., & Uzoma, O. V. (2007). Technophobia and its impact on adults learning to use computers in south western Nigeria. Journal of Information Technology Impact, 7(1), 81-90.
- Hou, J., Wu, Y., & Harrell, E. (2017). Reading on paper and screen among senior adults: Cognitive map and technophobia. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2225.
- Hogan, M. (2009). Op.Cit.
- ZariÅ, I. (2017). Technophobia among middle-aged and older adults in Latvia: A pilot study. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 183-189..
- Kotze, T. G., Anderson, O., & Summerfield, K. (2016). Technophobia: Gender differences in the adoption of high-technology consumer products. South African Journal of Business Management, 47(1), 21-28.
- Achuonye, K. A., & Ezekoka, G. K. (2011). Op.Cit.
- Martínez-Córcoles, M., Teichmann, M., & Murdvee, M. (2017). Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire. Technology in Society, 51, 183-188.
- Osiceanu, M. E. (2015). Psychological implications of modern technologies:“technofobia” versus “technophilia”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1137-1144.
- Barrientos-Gutierrez, I., Lozano, P., Arillo-Santillan, E., Morello, P., Mejia, R., & Thrasher, J. F. (2019). “Technophilia”: A new risk factor for electronic cigarette use among early adolescents?. Addictive behaviors, 91, 193-200.
- Hechanova, R. M., & Dioquino Jr, M. C. (2004). Technophobia and the Filipino Worker. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 37(2), 1-1.
- Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(3), 389-420.
- Rosen, L. D., & Weil, M. M. (1995). Computer availability, computer experience and technophobia among public school teachers. Computers in human behavior, 11(1), 9-31.
- Khasawneh, O. Y. (2018). Op.Cit.
- Anthony, L. M., Clarke, M. C., & Anderson, S. J. (2000). Op.Cit.
- Korukonda, A. R. (2005). Personality, individual characteristics, and predisposition to technophobia: some answers, questions, and points to ponder about. Information Sciences, 170(2-4), 309-328.
- Nugroho, A., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2020). EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices about digital learning of English. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 5(2), 304-321
- Rosen, L. D., & Weil, M. M. (1992). Measuring technophobia manual. Unpublished). Available: lrosen@ dhvx20. csudh. edu.
- Korukonda, A. R., & Finn, S. (2003). An investigation of framing and scaling as confounding variables in information outcomes: The case of technophobia. Information Sciences, 155(1-2), 79-88.
- Gulumbay, A. A., & Namlu, A. G. (2003). Technophobia Scale Development: Validity and Reliability Study. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 712-715). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Martínez-Córcoles, M., Teichmann, M., & Murdvee, M. (2017). Op.cit.
- Khasawneh, O. Y. (2018). Op.Cit.
- Wilson, M. L., Huggins-Manley, A. C., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Ruggles, K. (2022). Development of the Abbreviated Technology Anxiety Scale (ATAS). Behavior Research Methods, 1-15.
- Brosnan, M. J. (1999). Modeling technophobia: A case for word processing. Computers in human behavior, 15(2), 105-121.
- Wilfong, J. D. (2006). Computer anxiety and anger: The impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in human behavior, 22(6), 1001-1011.
- Akl, N. (2014). aleawamil almuathirat ealaa takhawuf almustakhdamin litiknulujia alaitisal alhaditha "altiknufwbya". almajalat almisriat libuhuth Al'iielam, jamieat Alqahira, 49(5), 211-177
- Bardakci, S., Alakurt, T., Akyüz, H., & Samsa, S. (2010). Pre-service teachers and technology: gender, technology experience, beliefs and predisposition to technophobia. In 9Th international internet education conference & exhibition (pp. 1-10).
- Thatcher, J. B., Loughry, M. L., Lim, J., & McKnight, D. H. (2007). Internet anxiety: An empirical study of the effects of personality, beliefs, and social support. Information & Management, 44(4), 353-363.
- Brosnan, M. J., & Thorpe, S. J. (2006). An evaluation of two clinically-derived treatments for technophobia. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1080-1095.
- Beckers, J. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2001). The structure of computer anxiety: A six-factor model. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 35-49.
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26
- Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 8-22.
- Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2007). Mixed methods in strategy research: Applications and implications in the resource-based view. In Research methodology in strategy and management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of mixed methods research, 2(3), 270-283
- Molina-Azorίn, J. F. (2011). The use and added value of mixed methods in management research. Journal of mixed methods research, 5(1), 7-24.
- Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2016). Mixed methods research: An opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills..
- Bowleg, L., Fielding, N., Maxwell, J., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2016). The future of mixed methods: A five year projection to 2020. MMIRA: White Papers.
- Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
- Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 15(2), 195-207.
- Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field methods, 18(1), 3-20.
- Subedi, D. (2016). Explanatory sequential mixed method design as the third research community of knowledge claim. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 570-577.
- Bowen, P., Rose, R., & Pilkington, A. (2017). Mixed methods-theory and practice. Sequential, explanatory approach. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 5(2), 10-27.
- Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Ectj, 29(2), 75-91.
- Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75.
- Subedi, D. (2016). Explanatory sequential mixed method design as the third research community of knowledge claim. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 570-577.
- Alzahrani, M. (2020). maeayir jawdat albuhuth alnaweiat fi aleulum al'iinsaniati. almajalat aldawliat lildirasat altarbawiat walnafsiati, 3(1), 605-622.
- Boyatzis, R. E. (1998).Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
- Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. sage publications.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds) APA handbook of research h methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological)p. 57–71).USA: American Psychological Association.
- Fugard, A. J., & Potts, H. W. (2015). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 669-684.
- Saldana.J.(2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd Edition.London,UK:SAGE.
- Yoon, S. H., Kim, H. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2021). What makes people watch online TV clips? An empirical investigation of survey data and viewing logs. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102329.
- Chu, P. C., & Spires, E. E. (1991). Validating the computer anxiety rating scale: Effects of cognitive style and computer courses on computer anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 7(1-2), 7-21.
- King, J., Bond, T., & Blandford, S. (2002). An investigation of computer anxiety by gender and grade. Computers in Human behavior, 18(1), 69-84.
- Ha, J. G., Page, T., & Thorsteinsson, G. (2011). A study on technophobia and mobile device design. International Journal of Contents, 7(2), 17-25.
- Todman, J., & Day, K. (2006). Computer anxiety: The role of psychological gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 856-869.
- Chua, S. L., Chen, D. T., & Wong, A. F. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: a meta-analysis. Computers in human behavior, 15(5), 609-623.
- Powell, A. L. (2013). Computer anxiety: Comparison of research from the 1990s and 2000s. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2337-2381.
- Chua, S. L., Chen, D. T., & Wong, A. F. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: a meta-analysis. Computers in human behavior, 15(5), 609-623.
- Çoklar, A. N., & Tatli, A. (2021). Examining the Digital Nativity Levels of Digital Generations: From Generation X to Generation Z. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(4), 433-444.
- Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 17(1), 1-7.
)
مشاهدة على SCiNiTO