• Honesty and accuracy in documenting, analyzing and disseminating data and results, without lying, misleading or deceiving.

• Openness, sharing data and results with researchers, and accepting constructive criticism.

• Respecting the intellectual property rights of publishing, attributing opinions to its owners and avoiding its plagiarism or theft, and not using any unpublished data or results without referring to its owner.

• Respecting privacy and maintaining the confidentiality of information, and maintaining the confidentiality of the entire audit process.

• Helping researchers, enhancing their capabilities, and enabling them to make their own decisions.

• Commitment to societal responsibility, striving to develop society and solve its problems through research and scientific studies.

• Adherence to the laws and regulations established by institutions and bodies organizing scientific research.

• Use the available resources wisely to achieve the desired goals.

• Adherence to the principles and rules governing writing the names of authors on scientific publications in a manner that guarantees the rights of the participants and the supporting bodies, as the list of authors must include all persons who contributed to

building the idea of ​​the research or in designing the research process and analyzing data or participating in the critical review of the working draft.

• Editors and arbitrators, with the exception of the person directly responsible for the editorial process (the editor or his representative), are not allowed to discuss the paper with any other person, including the author, and any distinct information or opinion obtained through arbitration should be kept confidential. Neither of them may be used for personal gain.

• Respect the rule of non-discrimination: The editors and reviewers evaluate the research material according to its intellectual content, taking into account the principle of non-discrimination on the basis of the religious belief or political philosophy of the author.

• Taking into account that no conflict of views occurs between the editors and the researcher, whether this is the result of a competitive, cooperative or other relationship or ties with any of the authors, companies, or institutions related to the research.