• The arbitrator must express his opinion with integrity and without any prejudice to any of the parties.

• Scientific research is judged with absolute secrecy in order to prevent manipulation and theft of scientific research.

• The arbitrator must provide his observations, opinions, criticisms, and directives.

• The arbitrator must refer to the paragraphs that the researcher plagiarized, and he must attach the original reference with them.

• The arbitrator must have sincerity, honesty and integrity at work. He must also be objective and put personal relationships on one side, and not let them affect him.

• The arbitrator must be patient and patient, and not be in a hurry.

• The arbitrator must be able to keep arbitration secrets.

• The arbitrator must be familiar with all standards and controls of scientific arbitration.

• The arbitrator must have sufficient information about the subject of the scientific research he is judging.

• The arbitrator must make the arbitration at a time when he finds complete comfort.

• The arbitrator must respect the effort made by the researcher in scientific research.

• The arbitrator should use gentle words that do not hurt the researcher while the arbitrator directs the observations for the scientific research.

• The arbitrator must ensure the quality of the research before issuing his decision to reject it or not.